Dynamo 3.0 moving to .NET 8

https://feedback.autodesk.com/project/forum/thread.html?cap=eb60b82d466546738ba757786e8dc5dc&forid={1abe4e39-9fdf-4b49-b151-8223076580d0}&topid={9874E04B-3237-4BBB-B3CD-9EEB30C254F7}&j=9874e04b32374bbbb3cd9eeb30c254f7

@mzjensen it solved thanks :love_you_gesture:

2 Likes

Hi @RMohareb ,
I am interested to hear, how did you solve the issue?
Any help from your side is welcomed.

1 Like

Hi @george you can found the solution in this post;
https://feedback.autodesk.com/project/forum/thread.html?cap=eb60b82d466546738ba757786e8dc5dc&forid={1abe4e39-9fdf-4b49-b151-8223076580d0}&topid={9874E04B-3237-4BBB-B3CD-9EEB30C254F7}&j=9874e04b32374bbbb3cd9eeb30c254f7

1- first use update beta version of c3d
2- use different method in .net8 to catch c3d com api.

2 Likes

Dose anyone try this version beforeļ¼ŸBack the year 2018,I need to manuall install dynamo1.3 to Revit 2016ļ¼Œin later years I have update dynamo manually and meet compatibility issues.So I prefer use dynamo come with Revit and donā€™t update it separately.
I donā€™t find Revit 2025 in my Autodesk account,I think itā€™s going to release in April.

So I am a bit confused. Does this mean that all python and c# is going to be unnecessary/ deprecated?
I still want to learn a programming language for Dynamo and am unsure which one I should learn

Not in the least. In fact it means that in the near term some C# and Python skills will go along way when adopting 2025 as some of the stuff which the community has been using without update for over a decade (not a joke) is apt to have some issues in the 2025 product line.

As far as which you should learn, it depends on what you want to do. Python is better for ā€˜quick studiesā€™ and ā€˜this one timeā€™, while C# is faster and scales better to other environments (Revit builds, Dynamo versions) than your own.

2 Likes

After AutoCAD 2025 been released for several days.I check the Autodesk Access and find there are no Revit 2025 yet,only AutoCAD and 3ds Max has 2025.
So why does Autodesk release this two product first.Is these two still their priority or because they have a lot experience and technology accumulation for these two productļ¼Ÿ

No particular reason to sequence really - we do have to roll out tools in a controlled timeline to prevent over burdening the system.

Some tools also have to come first from a logical standpoint though - Civil 3D, Advance Steel and other tools that are built on top of AutoCAD so both need AutoCAD out before they come out as one example.

You may also note that it is a holiday weekend, and some general logic around reduced staff availability around the globe might make issues harder to resolve if something does go wrongā€¦ well youā€™d be kinda nuts to roll out big stuff then - in software the phrasing is ā€˜donā€™t push to production on Fridayā€™ for a reason. :slight_smile:

3 Likes