I think it is good that you solved your own question, so you should credit yourself
According to your package… your screen dump looked like the below.
Some time ago, I shifted the “DanEDU” to be written in the end as “| DanEDU” and not in the beginning separated with a “.”. The below shown is how nodes look now. Besides, with the new look names are simplified (“FamilyDocument” has become “Family”)… I have walked through my nodes to make names shorter in general.
When we all are going to update to Dynamo 2.0 looks will change for all nodes there are coded as custom nodes (that are not Zerotouch). I change the look to anticipate this update. However, nodes will change even more when dynamo 2.0 is released because every “.” in a node name will end up as “folders” in the library view (the right pane in dynamo).
That is a very bad idea, but it seems like the dynamo team doesn’t care that this will have a huge impact on all custom nodes. So I am trying to prepare users of my package as good as possible to the day where dynamo 2.0 will be released, and still have a package there has the bare minimum for overview and usability. I am even considering moving towards zerotouch nodes because zerotouch nodes will not have this limitation.