Topography.ByPoints Node is Missing (Revit 2026)

Hello,
I have been having having problems with smoothening the sharp lines in Revit Toposolids. Thankfully, I found a tutorial that uses dynamo to kinda modify the imported toposurface by increasing the points and redrawing/ rejoining them, making much more pleasing to work with.

However, I can’t find the last node he connected to convert the points to toposolids in Dynamo(Rvt 2026). The node is called Topography.ByPoints. While I have attached screenshots of the nodes setup, can you please let me know what I am missing. Perhaps an alternative node or update of which I am not aware?
Ps; I have also tried using the Points node under the Toposolids tab, but an error just popped up. I would really appreciate your help.

I believe that with the underlying changes in Revit (since 2024) from topography elements to toposolids, you probably want a node called something like ToposolidByPointsType&Level (not sure of exact name I don’t have Dynamo in front of me)

Also- your screenshots are not legible- best to use the capture tool in Dynamo rather than the Winsows one

Yeah, agree with Andrew, did you try, ‘byPointsTypeAndLevel’?

You can just pick your lowest level and get the type ‘ByName’?

Hope that helps,

Mark

Okay guys, I will try that as soon as I get back to work.

incidentally, the topography/toposolid tools in Revit are ‘basic’- that’s being kind.

Adding extra points to smooth out lines will make it look nice by getting rid of nasty jagged contours- but not really smoothing it out. The surface editing tools in Civil3D are far better- it’s usually better to tweak the surface in C3D, then link it in to Revit

I have heard of the Civil3D software, but I have been reluctant to use it. Perhaps I felt the workflow would be too complicated and wanted to keep everything within Revit.

Meanwhile, if the dynamo workflow doesn’t work out great, I will have to consider the Civil3d. Though, I appreciate you pointing this out.

Thank you all for your help. This node setup worked.
I would probably have to explore the Civil3D - Revit workflow to check for a better result.