Can someone shed some insight?
(Dynamo Sanbox 3.4)
custompanel.dyn (19.9 KB)
Hey,
Maybe this helps? 
Mark
5 Likes
No where near as fun as the Dynamo competitions…
1 - These inputs were asking for integers
2 - This has to be a double nested list of UV coordinates
3 - This cuts the edges off… but it doesn’t make much sense how it does it to me, maybe I am missing something.
custompanelV2.dyn (22.1 KB)
EDIT : Just dawned on me that UV usually goes from 0 to 1 …
That’ll explain why it goes over the shape.
I’ll edit it so I’m within those ranges.
1 Like
3 Likes
Another message… 
For some reason you HAVE to have a displacement. 0 displacement gives errors.
Both of these examples have two tiles.
The input tile coordinates seem pretty unimportant. I thought their inputs would matter more.
1 Like
Maybe use this as basis for some interesting TSpline stuff in the nest challenge?
You can get the Edges of those panels i think
I wrote an algorithm a couple of years ago that tiled using lines… It seemed to fit into the edges better.
It could be me just not understanding this very well but I didn’t find these nodes easy to use.
I was in the Notre Dame team with @Alfredo_Medina and i wondered how the Rose Windows would look TSplined
1 Like
Wow! 
The question however is, (to TSpline it), would you do it the “easy” way by extracting the Element Geometry, or build it with Dynamo Geometry using Points and Arcs and some Math DesignScripting? (Just the Frame would suffice, i think)
Depends on the shape you’re trying to get (some panel types are easier in Revit, others in Dynamo; some geometry to panel easier in Revit others in Dynamo), and the end use (Revit paneling for generative design won’t work).
1 Like
The panelling won’t work in the generative design?
Are there future plans to make it work? I’d have thought that’d be one of the key features.
The Dynamo ones will - the Revit repeater tools in the adaptive and massing environments will not.