Hello guys,
I think it’s a school case but I loose my mind on this tiny code.
These two lists below have the same length.
Here what I Intend to do :
Can you help me please ?
Thanks for your answers.
Hello guys,
I think it’s a school case but I loose my mind on this tiny code.
These two lists below have the same length.
Here what I Intend to do :
Can you help me please ?
Thanks for your answers.
When getting into this sort of weird list manipulation exercise I find it much easier to go down the Python route (see below).
Murs_walls = IN[0]
Murs_joint_walls = IN[1]
#zip the lists to create the groups
combined = zip(Murs_walls, Murs_joint_walls)
new_lists = []
# for each zipped list
for zipped_list in combined:
# Get the top wall
Murs = zipped_list[0][0]
# For each sub wall under the top wall
for Murs_joint in zipped_list[1]:
# Append a list containing the top wall with the sub wall
new_lists.append([Murs,Murs_joint])
OUT = combined, new_lists
Just plug your wall lists in instead of my list of integers.
I’m sure @Dimitar_Venkov would be able to do this in 1 block of design script but I’m working with the tools I’ve got
@haganjake2 is right, you have way more control in python.
When working in DesignScript/nodes, however, the best thing you can do is keep equal list structures to make everything a one-to-one input in your function.
Thanks a lot @haganjake2 , it works perfectly. I must definitely learn Python language !
Thanks too @Nick_Boyts !!
High speed solution !!
Ahhh yes, of course, that’s a much smarter way to go about it.
Was being narrow-minded with my choice of nodes for creating new lists.
Can’t say I’ve used add item to front much before! Another useful one to be aware of.