When 3Dsolid are created from a script they appear just fine, but when the script is rerun the originally created 3Dsolid disappear. Is there a way i can fix this? [rd1qRC87V4]

Here’s a deep dive on how to use the new binding settings. [image] Dynamo For Civil 3D Binding Civil3D Hi @mparks8G2XN , This has been a point of confusion for a lot of folks for quite awhile, so let’s take the time to do a deep dive. Here’s an example. I’m using Civil 3…

With Dynamo player, I’m getting no bindings. In fact, I don’t even have to remove the bindings from the DWG. They aren’t even created. So, it appears that if you want binding, you need to run from Dynamo. If you don’t want bindings, you have to run from Player. Disregard that. I re-tested with…

I confirmed your results. Now we just need consistent results between Dynamo and Dynamo Player.

The player has it’s own issues: [image] Bugs in Player: Bindings and running mode difference Civil3D Today I discovered two strange behaviors of the Dynamo Player in Civil 3D and I assume they are bugs. I hope anyone can confirm this. A test script is added: Test_3Dpoly.…

I have created a lisp routine with just this line of code (DictRemove (namedobjdict) “DYNAMO_TRACE_DATA”) Then I load it into Civil3d-Autocad and it loads fine … Now, then I try to execute it with the command “file_name.lisp” but it doesn’t work for me. It says it is not a command … Am I missing …

You should define a function in that lisp. But it would not help you much since the binding is also saved in the graph file (nobody knows why the programmer thought that was a good idea).

the function is not "(DictRemove (namedobjdict) “DYNAMO_TRACE_DATA”) ?? What else does the lisp code need? GvdB It seems that it works, although I don’t understand how it does it.

[image] ramallafre: It seems that it works, although I don’t understand how it does it. [image] Passthrough, how can i understand that? DesignScript [2020-05-14_12h06_56] [2020-05-14_12h08_59] https://www.tutorialspoint.com/python/python_pass_statement.htm Hello D…

[image] Anton_Huizinga: nobody knows why the programmer thought that was a good idea The goal was to have a DYN workflow which wouldn’t require ‘delete and try again’ every time the base input (ie: building massing/ corridor) was revised. So the concept behind bindings becomes this: Run th…

Well, my post might sounded a bit sarcastic, but there is really no good reason to save the binding in a graph (despite your explaination). The drawing objects belong to the drawing and it is already possible to save bindings in the drawing. The graph does not and should not belong to a certain draw…

Originally created object disappears when i rerun the script

Civil 3D

JPhil April 16, 2022, 4:29am 47

UPDATE: For those that have come across this post, there are now some nodes to adjust the binding settings. See link below, the post talks about more than just bindings, so make sure to read the full post.

Topic		Replies	Views
Dynamo For Civil 3D Binding Civil 3D	11	2245	April 14, 2024
What's New for Dynamo in Civil 3D 2022.1 Civil 3D	32	2809	May 20, 2022
Dynamo Erase Create Object Civil 3D	5	1357	June 24, 2020
Element Binding in Revit Share revit , dynamo	35	14232	March 18, 2022
Binding data example in Dynamo for Civil 3D Civil 3D geometry , dynamo	10	1554	May 16, 2022

Originally created object disappears when i rerun the script

Related topics