Sending the data to the web and accessing all possible outputs of a graph via project fractal is the big reason. That alone is worth WAY more than the $40/month if leveraged correctly within the project workflow. If the team won’t use it, or the project is specific enough that options and portability aren’t needed, then the value certainly goes down. I would be interested to see if a shift to a ‘credits’ type system would work better for me (IE: X credits = no fractal access and X independent runs; 10x credits = fractal access and X independent runs…). Would be easier than having to plan monthly access.
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Project fractal output different from Dynamo studio output | 3 | 583 | September 25, 2018 | |
[1] Library Search [ Dynamo Studio(Core 1.3) vs Sandbox (Core 2.7) ] | 1 | 362 | March 19, 2021 | |
How Useful is fractal and dynamo web? | 2 | 540 | April 16, 2018 | |
Dynamo studio 2.0 (2019?)
|
12 | 2441 | December 3, 2018 | |
Mobile or standalone Sandbox version? | 6 | 2226 | November 12, 2021 |