I’ll submit an Improvement request into Jira for this one - agree the current behavior is odd.
I can also submit an Improvement request in for this one - makes sense to do!
We made the decision to not collapse the groups horizontally in the X-Axis as uncollapsing them could then overlap with a bunch of other nodes in the graph and reduce clarity. Could you please let us know what behavioral choices in the GH Clusters you prefer specifically?
These are mentioned in our blog posts - out of curiosity, do you read them? If so, was it not clear enough? From Dynamo 2.18 there are settings in the Preferences Panel for them that serialize to the .DYN file.
2300 nodes in a single graph? Wow… that’s really going to be pushing understandability limits! Is there a reason you need this mega-graph this way? Noting that every single node in a graph will hold onto it’s results in memory (By design - so that you can use preview bubbles etc. to inspect at every stage), and that rendering elements on a screen does take computer resources. However, we are aware we have scaling issues with Dynamo right now, as you duly noted, and will take a look at doing some Spikes on them shortly.
This sounds bad and we should investigate - do you happen to have the CER number on hand? FYI @Aaron_Tang
Can you check if you have the Show Run Preview option on? The orange nodes show you which nodes will recompute when you hit run (i.e. have been marked as dirty as their data has changed).