Most nodes I could experiment with longest lacing or cross product, and maybe there’s a node I’m not thinking of that would help, but my lists aren’t aligning the way I need them to. Instead of a list of ones, twos and threes. I was expecting 3 list of 12&3 each
Its an order of operations thing, as you’re not explicitly calling out the sequencing for joining the “@” and “-”. To get around that, I’d do something like this:
Breaking it down into parts:
- First get rid of the added complexity of appending the consistent separators.
(project+" @ "), but do so in parentheses so that we can utilize lacing on the result. - Then join that combined string with the level, so that we get all the projects and all the levels. Projects want to go first, so @L1 for that while levels want to go second, so @L2. We want to make sure we reuse the short list of projects, so longest lacing. Net result is :
(project + " @ ")@L1<1L> + level@L2<1L> - Then join the separator to the suffix or module value.
("-"+module), once again using parenthesis to ensure that it’s treated as a single list rather than multiple values. - Append the suffix to the project/level strings wrapped in another set of parenthesis so we can declare longest lacing , resulting in the final code:
results = ( (project + " @ ")@L1<1L> + level@L2<1L> )@L2<1L> + ("-"+module);
2 Likes
